Asanala Veerayya vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4666/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480and483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010289302026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/5807/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4666/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480and483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asanala Veerayya

    Adv. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    I'm ready to summarize the court judgment for case CRLP/4666/2026 involving Asanala Veerayya vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh. However, I don't see the actual judgment text in your message. Please provide the judgment text, and I'll deliver a concise 2-3 sentence summary of the court's decision and key reasoning in English, keeping it under 600 characters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

I'm ready to summarize the court judgment for case CRLP/4666/2026 involving Asanala Veerayya vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh. However, I don't see the actual judgment text in your message. Please provide the judgment text, and I'll deliver a concise 2-3 sentence summary of the court's decision and key reasoning in English, keeping it under 600 characters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case