Bandia Venkatesh, vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/15147/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010288882026

Filing Number

WP/23095/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15147/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

K Suresh Reddy

Coram

K Suresh Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bandia Venkatesh,

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR DASARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.,Bandia Alivelamma

  5. 5.Bandia Babayya,

  6. 6.State of Andhra Pradesh,

    Adv. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP No. 15147/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh admitted the writ petition filed by Bandia Venkatesh against the State of Andhra Pradesh and others. The court granted an interim order restraining respondents 1-3 from taking coercive action against the petitioner, while directing the petitioner to pay the amount specified by respondent No. 3 (Revenue Divisional Officer) to respondents 4 & 5, with the interim protection automatically vacating if payment is not made. The case was posted for further hearing on 29.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    K Suresh Reddy

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP No. 15147/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh admitted the writ petition filed by Bandia Venkatesh against the State of Andhra Pradesh and others. The court granted an interim order restraining respondents 1-3 from taking coercive action against the petitioner, while directing the petitioner to pay the amount specified by respondent No. 3 (Revenue Divisional Officer) to respondents 4 & 5, with the interim protection automatically vacating if payment is not made. The case was posted for further hearing on 29.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case