Bukke Venkataramana Naik vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLA/365/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010288662026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLA/5778/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLA/365/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLA ( 40 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bukke Venkataramana Naik

    Adv. SARMA C V S S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    CRLA 365/2026 - Summary Bukke Venkataramana Naik appealed his conviction for red sanders smuggling offenses under the A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, which resulted in a 5-year imprisonment sentence and ₹3,00,000 fine. The High Court suspended the sentence and granted bail on ₹25,000 with two sureties, citing that the appellant had no criminal antecedents, was on bail during trial, and co-accused No.2 was acquitted. The court found the petition for suspension of sentence convincing and conditioned release on maintaining police liaison about residential details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRLA 365/2026 - Summary Bukke Venkataramana Naik appealed his conviction for red sanders smuggling offenses under the A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, which resulted in a 5-year imprisonment sentence and ₹3,00,000 fine. The High Court suspended the sentence and granted bail on ₹25,000 with two sureties, citing that the appellant had no criminal antecedents, was on bail during trial, and co-accused No.2 was acquitted. The court found the petition for suspension of sentence convincing and conditioned release on maintaining police liaison about residential details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case