Agriculture Machinery Manufacturers Association (Andhra Pradesh) vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR AGRICULTURE — WP/15102/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226.

CNR: APHC010288172026

Filing Number

WP/23038/2026

Filing Date

31-May-2026

Registration No

WP/15102/2026

Registration Date

31-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

AP STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVE. CORPN. ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Agriculture Machinery Manufacturers Association (Andhra Pradesh)

    Adv. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR AGRICULTURE

  2. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh

    Adv. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

  3. 3.The State of Andhra Pradesh

    Adv. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

  4. 4.The A.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd

  5. 5.The Commissioner

  6. 6.The Director

  7. 7.Union of India

  8. 8.Union of India

  9. 9.Union of India

Case History

  1. 31-May-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  2. 31-May-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    Summary of WP No.15102 of 2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued an interim order directing the 4th respondent to permit the petitioner association's members to participate in the agricultural equipment procurement tender process and to process their tenders according to due process of law. The court found the state's e-procurement tender notification (No.933084) and corrigendums issued without following PM-RKVY operational guidelines as potentially illegal and arbitrary. The case was adjourned to after summer vacation 2026 for respondents to file counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No.15102 of 2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued an interim order directing the 4th respondent to permit the petitioner association's members to participate in the agricultural equipment procurement tender process and to process their tenders according to due process of law. The court found the state's e-procurement tender notification (No.933084) and corrigendums issued without following PM-RKVY operational guidelines as potentially illegal and arbitrary. The case was adjourned to after summer vacation 2026 for respondents to file counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case