Appala Seetharamaiah Alias Sitaramaiah vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4612/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION on 05th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010286912026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/5745/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4612/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 BNSS Anticipatory Bail(CRL.4A-N) ( 148 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Appala Seetharamaiah Alias Sitaramaiah
Adv. KISHORE KUMAR KATARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Appala Seetharamaiah (age 64) in connection with Crime No. 17 of 2026 registered at Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which was granted, and the court dismissed it as "not pressed" while permitting the petitioner to file a fresh petition at an appropriate time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
Balaji Medamalli
-
28-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4612/2026
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Appala Seetharamaiah (age 64) in connection with Crime No. 17 of 2026 registered at Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur District. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which was granted, and the court dismissed it as "not pressed" while permitting the petitioner to file a fresh petition at an appropriate time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts