Gowri Imrankhan vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4626/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --DISMISSED NO COSTS on 05th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010286852026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/5740/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4626/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED NO COSTS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gowri Imrankhan
Adv. JITENDRA KANYALUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/4626/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Gowri Imrankhan (Accused No. 2) in Crime No. 69/2026, which involves charges of criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation, and conspiracy for allegedly misappropriating ₹29,88,710 from his employer and transferring funds to multiple bank accounts. The court found the allegations supported by recorded transactions and noted that the investigation is ongoing with another accused still at large, making bail premature at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
Balaji Medamalli
-
28-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4626/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/4626/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Gowri Imrankhan (Accused No. 2) in Crime No. 69/2026, which involves charges of criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation, and conspiracy for allegedly misappropriating ₹29,88,710 from his employer and transferring funds to multiple bank accounts. The court found the allegations supported by recorded transactions and noted that the investigation is ongoing with another accused still at large, making bail premature at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts