Kuriti Santosh vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4595/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480and483. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010286002026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/5726/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4595/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480and483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kuriti Santosh

    Adv. BOPPUDI ALEKHYA

  2. 2.Kuriti Appanna

    Adv. BOPPUDI ALEKHYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/4595/2026 On 11.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the petition filed by Kuriti Santosh and Kuriti Appanna against the State of Andhra Pradesh. The matter was listed for hearing on 18.06.2026 at the request of the petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    Balaji Medamalli

  7. 28-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4595/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/4595/2026 On 11.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the petition filed by Kuriti Santosh and Kuriti Appanna against the State of Andhra Pradesh. The matter was listed for hearing on 18.06.2026 at the request of the petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case