Polavarapu Durga vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4592/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 05th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010285522026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/5714/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4592/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 BNSS Anticipatory Bail(CRL.4A-N) ( 148 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Polavarapu Durga
Adv. P NANILU NAIDU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP 4592/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted pre-arrest bail to Polavarapu Durga and two other female accused in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide. The court found their bail pleas convincing given that nine witnesses had already been examined, investigation was advanced, the accused were distant relatives of the deceased with no direct involvement in matrimonial affairs, and the primary accused had already been released on bail. Bail was conditional on executing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, cooperating with investigation, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
Balaji Medamalli
-
28-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4592/2026
Case Summary: CRLP 4592/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted pre-arrest bail to Polavarapu Durga and two other female accused in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide. The court found their bail pleas convincing given that nine witnesses had already been examined, investigation was advanced, the accused were distant relatives of the deceased with no direct involvement in matrimonial affairs, and the primary accused had already been released on bail. Bail was conditional on executing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties, cooperating with investigation, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts