Sri Gadde Suryanarayana vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — WP/14838/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010284722026

Filing Number

WP/22757/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

WP/14838/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Gadde Suryanarayana

    Adv. ABHISHEK NAIDU AKKENA

  2. 2.Sri. Kaluva Raveendra,

  3. 3.Sri. Dasari Balaiah,

  4. 4.Sri. Ede Maraiah Babu,

  5. 5.Sri. P. Manohar,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh

  2. 2.The Director / Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise

  3. 3.Additional Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise IHC Corporate Building,

  4. 4.Venkateswarlu

    Adv. M SRIKANTH

  5. 5.J. Ramesh

    Adv. M SRIKANTH

  6. 6.D.S.Durga Prasad

    Adv. M SRIKANTH

  7. 7.Shaik. Ahamed Basha

    Adv. M SRIKANTH

  8. 8.Madhusudhana Rao Guntupalli

    Adv. M SRIKANTH

  9. 9.U.Subbarao

    Adv. P V A PADMANABHAM

  10. 10.D.Sailaja Rani

    Adv. P V A PADMANABHAM

  11. 11.Ganugula Pandu Rangarao

    Adv. P V A PADMANABHAM

  12. 12.C.Bhargava

    Adv. P V A PADMANABHAM

  13. 13.R.V.Prasad Reddy

    Adv. P V A PADMANABHAM

  14. 14.Elika Srinivasa Rao

    Adv. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

  15. 15.Seella Krishna Kishore

    Adv. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

  16. 16.D.Raghuma Reddy,

    Adv. ADAPA RAMYA SAHITHI NAIDU

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Admission (Service Matters)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 14838/2026 Outcome: Interim relief DENIED. The court adjourned the case to 23.06.2026 and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit. Any promotions under the impugned list are made subject to further court orders. Key Points: Five Assistant Prohibition & Excise Superintendents challenged a provisional promotion list issued pending finalization of seniority lists. The court found no prima facie case for interim relief, holding that petitioners lack current legal injury since they don't meet the two-year service eligibility requirement until 27.09.2026, and that eligibility is mandatory even for temporary promotions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Service Matters)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Admission (Service Matters)

    Tuhin Kumar Gedela

  7. 29-May-2026

    Tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF

  8. 29-May-2026

    Admission (Service Matters)

    Tuhin Kumar Gedela

  9. 28-May-2026

    Tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF

  10. 28-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14838/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 14838/2026 Outcome: Interim relief DENIED. The court adjourned the case to 23.06.2026 and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit. Any promotions under the impugned list are made subject to further court orders. Key Points: Five Assistant Prohibition & Excise Superintendents challenged a provisional promotion list issued pending finalization of seniority lists. The court found no prima facie case for interim relief, holding that petitioners lack current legal injury since they don't meet the two-year service eligibility requirement until 27.09.2026, and that eligibility is mandatory even for temporary promotions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case