Patnala Naresh Kumar vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4572/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED NO COSTS on 05th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010284562026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/5687/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4572/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 BNSS Anticipatory Bail(CRL.4A-N) ( 148 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED NO COSTS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Patnala Naresh Kumar
Adv. PERLA NOOKARAJU
-
2.Garikina Aparna
Adv. PERLA NOOKARAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Malla Shankara Rao
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the pre-arrest bail petition filed by Patnala Naresh Kumar and Garikina Aparna in a Rs. 15 crore unregulated deposit scheme fraud case. The court rejected their plea citing the serious nature of allegations involving substantial financial fraud through various schemes, the preliminary stage of investigation with only five witnesses examined so far, and lack of changed circumstances since an earlier dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
04-Jun-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
Balaji Medamalli
-
28-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4572/2026
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the pre-arrest bail petition filed by Patnala Naresh Kumar and Garikina Aparna in a Rs. 15 crore unregulated deposit scheme fraud case. The court rejected their plea citing the serious nature of allegations involving substantial financial fraud through various schemes, the preliminary stage of investigation with only five witnesses examined so far, and lack of changed circumstances since an earlier dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts