RACHARLA NAGESH SANJEEVARAYUDU vs THE STATE OF AP — WP/14542/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 15th May 2026.
CNR: APHC010281472026
Filing Number
WP/22538/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
WP/14542/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Coram
Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
EDUCATION (MISC.MATTERS) ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RACHARLA NAGESH SANJEEVARAYUDU
Adv. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF AP
-
2.The Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan,
-
3.The Director,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF
Case Summary: WP 14542/2026 Racharla Nagesh Sanjeevarayudu challenged his disqualification from a government tender (NIT No. 49/2026) for egg supply to schools and Anganwadi centers, claiming the respondents wrongfully rejected his bid despite providing a bank guarantee beyond the required period. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to set aside the disqualification, alleging violation of constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 15.05.2026, after the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw and pursue appropriate remedies through other legal means. No costs were awarded, and all pending interlocutory applications were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Admission (Education )
Tuhin Kumar Gedela
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14542/2026
Case Summary: WP 14542/2026 Racharla Nagesh Sanjeevarayudu challenged his disqualification from a government tender (NIT No. 49/2026) for egg supply to schools and Anganwadi centers, claiming the respondents wrongfully rejected his bid despite providing a bank guarantee beyond the required period. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to set aside the disqualification, alleging violation of constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 15.05.2026, after the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw and pursue appropriate remedies through other legal means. No costs were awarded, and all pending interlocutory applications were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts