Guntur Miriayarani, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/14525/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010281222026
Filing Number
WP/22515/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
WP/14525/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Coram
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Guntur Miriayarani,
Adv. CHENNAKESAVULU KOTTE
-
2.Guntur Vinod,
-
3.Guntur Ravindra,
-
4.Guntur Surendra,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
4.The Tahasildar,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
28-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
Case Summary: WP 14525/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the hearing in this writ petition filed by Guntur Miriayarani, Guntur Vinod, and Guntur Ravindra against the State of Andhra Pradesh and revenue officials. The petitioners challenged attempts to dispose them of agricultural land (0.77 acres) for burial ground extension without following due legal process. The Court extended the interim order previously granted and posted the matter after Summer Vacation 2026 at the request of petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Admission (Revenue)
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
14-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
14-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14525/2026
Case Summary: WP 14525/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the hearing in this writ petition filed by Guntur Miriayarani, Guntur Vinod, and Guntur Ravindra against the State of Andhra Pradesh and revenue officials. The petitioners challenged attempts to dispose them of agricultural land (0.77 acres) for burial ground extension without following due legal process. The Court extended the interim order previously granted and posted the matter after Summer Vacation 2026 at the request of petitioners' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts