GADDAM SUMAN vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE — WP/14486/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010280662026
Filing Number
WP/22467/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
WP/14486/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Coram
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GADDAM SUMAN
Adv. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
-
2.suragani Sai Kishore,
-
3.Venna Srinivasa Reddy,
-
4.Padavala Jeevan Kishore,
-
5.Yeddanapalli Naveen Chand,
-
6.Gudiwaka Ramanjaneyulu,
-
7.Chebrolu Sarath Babu,
-
8.Yandrathi Yagnateja,
-
9.Chebrolu Sarath Babu,
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
-
2.The Commissioner,
-
3.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer,
-
4.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer,
-
5.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
Case Summary: WP 14486/2026 Outcome: Writ petition disposed of with interim directions. The Andhra Pradesh High Court directed the Prohibition and Excise Department to dispose of the petitioners' representation (dated 25.02.2026) seeking bar licenses without bank guarantees within three weeks. If the representation is unavailable, respondents must request resubmission and dispose within three additional weeks. Respondents are prohibited from taking coercive action against petitioners pending disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Admission (Excise)
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14486/2026
Case Summary: WP 14486/2026 Outcome: Writ petition disposed of with interim directions. The Andhra Pradesh High Court directed the Prohibition and Excise Department to dispose of the petitioners' representation (dated 25.02.2026) seeking bar licenses without bank guarantees within three weeks. If the representation is unavailable, respondents must request resubmission and dispose within three additional weeks. Respondents are prohibited from taking coercive action against petitioners pending disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts