MADDIBOINA VASU vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, — WP/14327/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010279642026

Filing Number

WP/22430/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/14327/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADDIBOINA VASU

    Adv. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI

  2. 2.Chintam Mahendra,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

  2. 2.The Commissioner/Director,

  3. 3.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer

  4. 4.The Station House Officer,

  5. 5.The Station House Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 14327/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by two liquor shop license holders challenging demands for Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 7,50,000 respectively toward permit room license fees, which they did not intend to obtain. The court directed respondents to dispose of the petitioners' representation dated 11.05.2026 within three weeks and prohibited any coercive action against them pending decision, effectively granting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Admission (Excise)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 14327/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by two liquor shop license holders challenging demands for Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 7,50,000 respectively toward permit room license fees, which they did not intend to obtain. The court directed respondents to dispose of the petitioners' representation dated 11.05.2026 within three weeks and prohibited any coercive action against them pending decision, effectively granting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case