YERRAGUTLA MANJU BHARGAVI REDDY vs NAGA CHANDRA MOHAN — MACMA /291/2023
Case under Motor Vehiicles Act Section 173. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010271472023
Filing Number
MACMA /22053/2023
Filing Date
13-06-2023
Registration No
MACMA /291/2023
Registration Date
26-06-2023
Judge
V.SUJATHA
Coram
V.SUJATHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
CIVIL Section
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YERRAGUTLA MANJU BHARGAVI REDDY
Adv. Y BHAGYALAKSHMI REDDY
Respondent(s)
NAGA CHANDRA MOHAN
Bandi Devaraju Reddy
The Divisional Manager,
Adv. N RAMA KRISHNA
The Divisional Manager,
Hearing History
Judge: V.SUJATHA
FOR ADMISSION
FOR DISMISSAL
FOR DISMISSAL
FOR DISMISSAL
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-07-2023 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR DISMISSAL | |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR DISMISSAL | |
| 31-03-2026 | FOR DISMISSAL | |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the claimant's appeal seeking compensation for vehicle damage from a 2018 motor accident. While the court found that the accident occurred due to the defendant's rash and negligent driving, it upheld the tribunal's dismissal because the claimant failed to prove registered ownership of the damaged vehicle—repair bills showed another person's name as the tax invoice holder and the claimant only as "customer name," not as owner with proper registration certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the claimant's appeal seeking compensation for vehicle damage from a 2018 motor accident. While the court found that the accident occurred due to the defendant's rash and negligent driving, it upheld the tribunal's dismissal because the claimant failed to prove registered ownership of the damaged vehicle—repair bills showed another person's name as the tax invoice holder and the claimant only as "customer name," not as owner with proper registration certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts