Pedada Ramana Murthy, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/14143/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
CNR: APHC010269982026
Filing Number
WP/21617/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
WP/14143/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Balaji Medamalli
Coram
Balaji Medamalli
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pedada Ramana Murthy,
Adv. VASAVI RATNA KUMARI DANDAMUDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Superintendent of Police,
-
3.The Circle Inspector,
-
4.The station house officer,
-
5.The Station House Officer,
-
6.Bonugu Satya Padma,
Case History
-
28-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-May-2026
Admission (Home)
Balaji Medamalli
-
15-May-2026
Balaji MedamalliView PDF
-
15-May-2026
Balaji MedamalliView PDF
Case Summary: WP 14143/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to after Summer Vacation 2026. Interim order issued directing police not to interfere with petitioner's personal liberty without following due legal process. Key Details: Petitioner Pedada Ramana Murthy sought a mandamus against Andhra Pradesh police, alleging repeated and unlawful summons to police station despite compliance with bind-over proceedings and absence of fresh complaints or legal basis. The High Court partially granted relief by restraining police from calling the petitioner without proper procedure under Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Admission (Home)
Balaji Medamalli
-
14-May-2026
Admission (Home)
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
08-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14143/2026
Case Summary: WP 14143/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to after Summer Vacation 2026. Interim order issued directing police not to interfere with petitioner's personal liberty without following due legal process. Key Details: Petitioner Pedada Ramana Murthy sought a mandamus against Andhra Pradesh police, alleging repeated and unlawful summons to police station despite compliance with bind-over proceedings and absence of fresh complaints or legal basis. The High Court partially granted relief by restraining police from calling the petitioner without proper procedure under Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts