The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, vs B. Durga Raja Sena, Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI — WA /754/2025
Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010269242025
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
WA /20009/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
WA /754/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Judge
BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Coram
BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 27 )
Sub-Category
APPSC (MISC.MATTERS) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission,
Adv. G.SEENA KUMAR SC For APPSC
Respondent(s)
B. Durga Raja Sena, Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Adv. GP FOR SERVICES I
Mona Sayed,
Y. Lalithya,
Hearing History
Judge: BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CLARIFICATION
FOR BEING MENTIONED
FOR BEING MENTIONED
FOR BEING MENTIONED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-07-2025 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR CLARIFICATION | |
| 01-12-2025 | FOR BEING MENTIONED | |
| 04-11-2025 | FOR BEING MENTIONED | |
| 14-10-2025 | FOR BEING MENTIONED |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" in Writ Appeal No. 754 of 2025, directing Respondents 3 and 4 to explain why the appeal should be admitted within four weeks. The court sought clarifications on three aspects: compliance with prior review petition orders, service of notice to newly impleaded respondents, and the final answer key for a disputed question. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for "part-heard" hearing after counsel requested time to submit written clarifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" in Writ Appeal No. 754 of 2025, directing Respondents 3 and 4 to explain why the appeal should be admitted within four weeks. The court sought clarifications on three aspects: compliance with prior review petition orders, service of notice to newly impleaded respondents, and the final answer key for a disputed question. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for "part-heard" hearing after counsel requested time to submit written clarifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts