AJ FABRICS vs THE UNION OF INDIA — WP/13267/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 14th May 2026.
CNR: APHC010264972025
Filing Number
WP/19631/2025
Filing Date
08-May-2025
Registration No
WP/13267/2025
Registration Date
08-May-2025
Judge
Y. Lakshmana Rao , Balaji Medamalli
Coram
Y. Lakshmana Rao , Balaji Medamalli
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJ FABRICS
Adv. RAVITEJA PADIRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA
-
2.Central Board of Indirect Taxes Customs
Adv. SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
-
3.Principal Commissioner
Adv. SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
-
4.Chief Commissioner, Customs
Adv. SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
-
5.Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Adv. SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
-
6.Deputy Director
Adv. SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana Rao,balaji MedamalliView PDF
Case Summary: WP 13267/2025 - AJ FABRICS v. UNION OF INDIA The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by AJ Fabrics as withdrawn on 14.05.2026. AJ Fabrics had challenged the seizure of imported Mixed Paraffin Oil (Bills of Entry Nos 8929666, 8929663, 8929664 dated 17.03.2025) by customs authorities, seeking release of the goods and compensation for demurrage charges. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the court with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2026
Interlocutory
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
03-Feb-2026
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Interlocutory
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
20-Jan-2026
Interlocutory
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
30-Dec-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
Interlocutory
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
09-Dec-2025
Interlocutory
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
02-Dec-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Interlocutory
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
23-Oct-2025
Interlocutory
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
25-Sep-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Admission
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
18-Sep-2025
Admission
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
11-Sep-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
04-Sep-2025
Admission
Battu Devanand , T.c.d.sekhar
-
28-Aug-2025
Battu Devanand,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Admission
Battu Devanand , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
21-Aug-2025
Battu Devanand,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
28-Jul-2025
Admission
Ninala Jayasurya , Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
21-Jul-2025
Admission
Ninala Jayasurya , Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
14-Jul-2025
Admission
Ninala Jayasurya , Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
07-Jul-2025
Admission
Ninala Jayasurya , Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
30-Jun-2025
For Admission
Ninala Jayasurya , Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
09-May-2025
Ninala Jayasurya,tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF
-
09-May-2025
Ninala Jayasurya,tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF
-
09-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/13267/2025
Case Summary: WP 13267/2025 - AJ FABRICS v. UNION OF INDIA The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by AJ Fabrics as withdrawn on 14.05.2026. AJ Fabrics had challenged the seizure of imported Mixed Paraffin Oil (Bills of Entry Nos 8929666, 8929663, 8929664 dated 17.03.2025) by customs authorities, seeking release of the goods and compensation for demurrage charges. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the court with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts