DR SHAIK ASHRUF ALI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/13758/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010263772026

Filing Number

WP/21159/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/13758/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Balaji Medamalli

Coram

Balaji Medamalli

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR SHAIK ASHRUF ALI

    Adv. PUPPALA SNEHA LATHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police

  3. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.The Circle Inspector of Police

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

  6. 6.Janardhan Reddy,

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Balaji MedamalliView PDF

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Balaji Medamalli

  4. 07-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Summary: On 07.05.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Dr. YLR, J.) adjourned the writ petition filed by Dr. Shaik Ashruf Ali against the State of Andhra Pradesh and police officials. The case was posted to the First Vacation Court 2026 for the Assistant Government Pleader to obtain instructions, with the matter to be included in the Motion-List for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 07.05.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Dr. YLR, J.) adjourned the writ petition filed by Dr. Shaik Ashruf Ali against the State of Andhra Pradesh and police officials. The case was posted to the First Vacation Court 2026 for the Assistant Government Pleader to obtain instructions, with the matter to be included in the Motion-List for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case