Sirra Vijayaratnam, vs Maka Satyanarayana Advocate - PATHURI SRINIVAS — CRP/1497/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 11th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010255432023

Filing Number

CRP/20725/2023

Filing Date

12-May-2023

Registration No

CRP/1497/2023

Registration Date

21-Jun-2023

Judge

Ravi Cheemalapati

Coram

Ravi Cheemalapati

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

11-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sirra Vijayaratnam,

    Adv. A VARALAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maka Satyanarayana Advocate - PATHURI SRINIVAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's counsel one final opportunity to present arguments in Civil Revision Petition No.1497 of 2023, despite the petitioner's previous non-appearance on two occasions. The court postponed the matter to 08.04.2026 for final hearing, balancing fairness to the petitioner against the respondent's concern that the decree holder's enforcement has been stalled due to the revision's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

  5. 03-Jul-2023

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  6. 03-Jul-2023

    For Admission

    R Raghunandan Rao

  7. 21-Jun-2023

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  8. 21-Jun-2023

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  9. 21-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1497/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's counsel one final opportunity to present arguments in Civil Revision Petition No.1497 of 2023, despite the petitioner's previous non-appearance on two occasions. The court postponed the matter to 08.04.2026 for final hearing, balancing fairness to the petitioner against the respondent's concern that the decree holder's enforcement has been stalled due to the revision's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case