CHINNAENTI VENKATESULU vs VEDIYAM RAMAMOORTHY REDDY — CRLP/4857/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: APHC010251902019
Filing Number
CRLP/6702/2019
Filing Date
13-Aug-2019
Registration No
CRLP/4857/2019
Registration Date
13-Aug-2019
Judge
K Suresh Reddy
Coram
K Suresh Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 Cr.p.c under sec.138 and 142 ( 68 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHINNAENTI VENKATESULU
Adv. T C KRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.VEDIYAM RAMAMOORTHY REDDY
-
2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
For Extension Of Interim Orders
K Suresh Reddy
-
01-May-2026
K Suresh ReddyView PDF
Summary: In Crl.P. No.4857 of 2019 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, the Court permitted petitioner's counsel to take out fresh personal notice to the 1st respondent and file proof of service in the Registry due to previous inadvertence, with the case adjourned to 03.07.2026. The Court also held that the interim order extended on 01.10.2020 remains in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Extension Of Interim Orders
K Suresh Reddy
-
10-Apr-2026
K Suresh ReddyView PDF
-
01-Oct-2020
J K MaheshwariView PDF
-
07-Nov-2019
For Extension Of Time
M.seetharama Murti
-
18-Sep-2019
For Admission
U.durga Prasad Rao
-
04-Sep-2019
For Admission
U.durga Prasad Rao
-
30-Aug-2019
For Admission
U.durga Prasad Rao
-
14-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4857/2019
Summary: In Crl.P. No.4857 of 2019 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, the Court permitted petitioner's counsel to take out fresh personal notice to the 1st respondent and file proof of service in the Registry due to previous inadvertence, with the case adjourned to 03.07.2026. The Court also held that the interim order extended on 01.10.2020 remains in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts