BHAVANI ANUMOLU vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/13444/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010248242026

Filing Number

WP/19870/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/13444/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Balaji Medamalli

Coram

Balaji Medamalli

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVANI ANUMOLU

    Adv. KONA N.D.V.RAMANA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police

  3. 3.The Station House Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Balaji MedamalliView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 13444/2026 Bhavani Anumolu filed a writ petition challenging the police's failure to register an FIR based on her complaint dated 26.02.2026, claiming the inaction violated Article 21 of the Constitution. However, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the police had subsequently registered the case based on her complaint, making the relief sought no longer necessary. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Balaji Medamalli

  4. 14-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  5. 08-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  6. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 13444/2026 Bhavani Anumolu filed a writ petition challenging the police's failure to register an FIR based on her complaint dated 26.02.2026, claiming the inaction violated Article 21 of the Constitution. However, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the police had subsequently registered the case based on her complaint, making the relief sought no longer necessary. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case