MARUGULLA AMMORAIAH vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/12432/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010235622023

Filing Number

WP/19034/2023

Filing Date

08-May-2023

Registration No

WP/12432/2023

Registration Date

08-May-2023

Judge

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Coram

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARUGULLA AMMORAIAH

    Adv. M VIDYAVATHI

  2. 2.Manjula Mallikarjun Rao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar,

  5. 5.The Village Revenue Officer

  6. 6.Kapilavai Annapurnamma

    Adv. P PRABHAKAR RAO

  7. 7.Vemula Murali Krishna

    Adv. P PRABHAKAR RAO

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

    Case Adjourned. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the Tahsildar (respondent) 10 additional days to file the counter affidavit, with the matter to be listed again after this period. The Tahsildar's personal attendance was dispensed with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

  7. 19-Jun-2024

    Admission (Revenue)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  8. 10-May-2023

    B Krishna MohanView PDF

  9. 10-May-2023

    B Krishna MohanView PDF

  10. 10-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12432/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the Tahsildar (respondent) 10 additional days to file the counter affidavit, with the matter to be listed again after this period. The Tahsildar's personal attendance was dispensed with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case