RAGHAVENDRA PASUPULATI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/12486/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: APHC010227492026
Filing Number
WP/18275/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/12486/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Balaji Medamalli
Coram
Balaji Medamalli
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHAVENDRA PASUPULATI
Adv. DOYIJODE SREENIVASA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Director General of Police,
-
3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
-
4.The Superintendent of Police,
-
5.The Circle Inspector of Police,
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Admission (Home)
Balaji Medamalli
-
15-May-2026
Balaji MedamalliView PDF
-
15-May-2026
Balaji MedamalliView PDF
Case Summary: WP 12486/2026 - Raghavendra Pasupulati v. State of Andhra Pradesh The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to prevent police interference in matrimonial disputes and to preserve CCTV footage from March 20, 2026. The court found that while the petitioner's allegations of abuse and manhandling by the 5th respondent (Circle Inspector) were denied, a crime was registered under Sections 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS based on intimidation. The court directed the 5th respondent to file a counter-affidavit by the next hearing, ordered the petitioner to cooperate with the investigation while ensuring due process, and directed preservation of the disputed CCTV footage. Matter listed for June 22, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Admission (Home)
Balaji Medamalli
-
14-May-2026
Admission (Home)
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
04-May-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/12486/2026
Case Summary: WP 12486/2026 - Raghavendra Pasupulati v. State of Andhra Pradesh The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to prevent police interference in matrimonial disputes and to preserve CCTV footage from March 20, 2026. The court found that while the petitioner's allegations of abuse and manhandling by the 5th respondent (Circle Inspector) were denied, a crime was registered under Sections 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS based on intimidation. The court directed the 5th respondent to file a counter-affidavit by the next hearing, ordered the petitioner to cooperate with the investigation while ensuring due process, and directed preservation of the disputed CCTV footage. Matter listed for June 22, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts