TAMMINENI PEDA RAMI REDDY AND 2 OTHERS vs THE STATE OF AP., REP BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,B D MAHESWARA REDDY — WP/32765/2014
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 16th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010226582014
Filing Number
WP/175337/2014
Filing Date
27-Oct-2014
Registration No
WP/32765/2014
Registration Date
30-Oct-2014
Judge
Harinath.n
Coram
Harinath.n
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAMMINENI PEDA RAMI REDDY AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. VENKATESWARLU GADA
-
2.Sangu Subba Reddy,
-
3.Sangu Ravindra,
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF AP., REP BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,B D MAHESWARA REDDY
-
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
3.The Tahsildar, Kanigiri Mandal,
-
4.The Commissioner,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Harinath.nView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by property owners challenging attempted demolition of their residential structures in Kanigiri by municipal authorities without prior notice or due process. The court upheld interim orders passed on 31.10.2014 and clarified that respondent authorities remain at liberty to take appropriate action by issuing fresh notices and proceeding in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Aug-2024
Specially Identified Cases
B Krishna Mohan
-
18-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2014
Case filed
Registration No. WP/32765/2014
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by property owners challenging attempted demolition of their residential structures in Kanigiri by municipal authorities without prior notice or due process. The court upheld interim orders passed on 31.10.2014 and clarified that respondent authorities remain at liberty to take appropriate action by issuing fresh notices and proceeding in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts