THATI SUDHA DEVI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV — WP/11765/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010223642023

Filing Number

WP/18063/2023

Filing Date

03-May-2023

Registration No

WP/11765/2023

Registration Date

03-May-2023

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THATI SUDHA DEVI

    Adv. T DIWAKAR REDDY

  2. 2.Thati Sudha Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

  2. 2.District Collector,

  3. 3.District Panchayat Officer,

  4. 4.Muddanur Grama panchayat

    Adv. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats

  5. 5.Mandal Surveyor,

  6. 6.Village Surveyor,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by petitioners challenging the demolition of their compound wall by the Gram Panchayat. The court held that the case involves disputed questions of fact (whether demolition was high-handed or consensual) that cannot be adjudicated in a writ petition under Article 226, and directed the petitioners to pursue their relief through an appropriate civil suit instead. The court noted the survey confirmed the petitioners had encroached 6-8 feet on common road space. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Subba Reddy Satti

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Subba Reddy Satti

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Ravi Cheemalapati

  14. 02-Jan-2026

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Ravi Cheemalapati

  16. 15-Dec-2025

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

  17. 15-Dec-2025

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Ravi Cheemalapati

  18. 01-Dec-2025

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

  19. 14-Jun-2023

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    R Raghunandan Rao

  20. 04-May-2023

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  21. 04-May-2023

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  22. 04-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 03-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11765/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by petitioners challenging the demolition of their compound wall by the Gram Panchayat. The court held that the case involves disputed questions of fact (whether demolition was high-handed or consensual) that cannot be adjudicated in a writ petition under Article 226, and directed the petitioners to pursue their relief through an appropriate civil suit instead. The court noted the survey confirmed the petitioners had encroached 6-8 feet on common road space. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case