Mamidipalli Saibabu, vs Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission, Advocate - GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/32547/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Jun-2017

CNR: APHC010220652016

Filing Number

WP/174219/2016

Filing Date

23-Sep-2016

Registration No

WP/32547/2016

Registration Date

23-Sep-2016

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANIOUS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mamidipalli Saibabu,

    Adv. PRAKASH BUDDARAPU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission, Advocate - GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.The Election Commissioner / Commissioner,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mamidipalli Saibabu challenging election notifications for Amalapuram Municipality as infructuous. The petitioner sought a mandamus to conduct Ward Member elections for the 4th Ward before the Chairperson election, contending the notifications were illegal and contrary to the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965. However, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for consideration, the court found no adjudication on merits was necessary and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2017

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Case Is In Onwards List

  4. 23-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/32547/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mamidipalli Saibabu challenging election notifications for Amalapuram Municipality as infructuous. The petitioner sought a mandamus to conduct Ward Member elections for the 4th Ward before the Chairperson election, contending the notifications were illegal and contrary to the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965. However, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for consideration, the court found no adjudication on merits was necessary and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case