BARATHA JAGAN vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/3619/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010216882022

Filing Number

CRLP/4126/2022

Filing Date

28-Apr-2022

Registration No

CRLP/3619/2022

Registration Date

05-May-2022

Judge

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Coram

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARATHA JAGAN

    Adv. V.N.V.SURYA DATTU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Karnati Rohini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Criminal Petition No. 3619/2022 filed by Baratha Jagan seeking to quash proceedings in Crime No. 126 of 2022 (registered under IPC Sections 448, 354-A(2), 354D, and 506) as infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that nothing survived for adjudication, and consequently closed all miscellaneous petitions pending in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  7. 06-May-2022

    D RameshView PDF

  8. 06-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/3619/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Criminal Petition No. 3619/2022 filed by Baratha Jagan seeking to quash proceedings in Crime No. 126 of 2022 (registered under IPC Sections 448, 354-A(2), 354D, and 506) as infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that nothing survived for adjudication, and consequently closed all miscellaneous petitions pending in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case