P. Bala Gurappa, vs SRI K. JAYA BARATHI REDDY,Commissioner, Advocate - MD SALEEM (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR), ,GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS — CC/1568/2011

Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2013

CNR: APHC010215172011

Filing Number

CC/2423/2011

Filing Date

25-Apr-2011

Registration No

CC/1568/2011

Registration Date

23-Nov-2011

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

OS Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Bala Gurappa,

    Adv. TURAGA SAI SURYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI K. JAYA BARATHI REDDY,Commissioner, Advocate - MD SALEEM (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR), ,GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

  2. 2.Sri D.Chenna Krishna Reddy

    Adv. K NARSI REDDY

  3. 3.Sri G. Venkata Subbaiah

    Adv. K NARSI REDDY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    Case Summary: CC/1568/2011 P. Bala Gurappa filed a contempt of court petition against municipal and roads department officials for allegedly violating a High Court order dated July 16, 2010. The court found that the underlying writ petition had already been disposed of, making further proceedings unnecessary. Justice Harinath.N closed the contempt case without imposing any penalties or ordering costs, as no further relief could be granted once the principal writ petition was concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2013

    For Admission

    G.rohini

  4. 25-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. CC/1568/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC/1568/2011 P. Bala Gurappa filed a contempt of court petition against municipal and roads department officials for allegedly violating a High Court order dated July 16, 2010. The court found that the underlying writ petition had already been disposed of, making further proceedings unnecessary. Justice Harinath.N closed the contempt case without imposing any penalties or ordering costs, as no further relief could be granted once the principal writ petition was concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case