SK IMAMBI vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/12239/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010206002026

Filing Number

WP/16564/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/12239/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Balaji Medamalli

Coram

Balaji Medamalli

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK IMAMBI

    Adv. KHAJARAHAMATULLA S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The superintendent of Police,

  3. 3.The station house Officer

  4. 4.Bochu Dattatreya

  5. 5.Regalagadda Mala Kondaiah

  6. 6.Meesala Lakshmi Narayana

  7. 7.Rodda Vemaiah

  8. 8.Ragi Ramesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Balaji MedamalliView PDF

    Case Summary: SK IMAMBI v. THE STATE OF AP (WP 12239/2026) Court Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition, finding the dispute to be civil in nature rather than criminal. The court held that the respondent authorities conducted a preliminary inquiry and correctly determined that pending civil disputes regarding land title, ownership, and possession cannot support criminal proceedings in the absence of prima facie evidence of a cognizable offense. Key Reasoning: The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing police to initiate criminal proceedings against respondents for allegedly trespassing on her 2.74-cent agricultural land and destroying her Eucalyptus crop. The court accepted the government's submission that the matter requires adjudication by a competent Civil Court, not criminal prosecution, and found no inaction or negligence by officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Balaji Medamalli

  4. 14-May-2026

    Admission

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  5. 08-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  6. 01-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  7. 01-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SK IMAMBI v. THE STATE OF AP (WP 12239/2026) Court Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition, finding the dispute to be civil in nature rather than criminal. The court held that the respondent authorities conducted a preliminary inquiry and correctly determined that pending civil disputes regarding land title, ownership, and possession cannot support criminal proceedings in the absence of prima facie evidence of a cognizable offense. Key Reasoning: The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing police to initiate criminal proceedings against respondents for allegedly trespassing on her 2.74-cent agricultural land and destroying her Eucalyptus crop. The court accepted the government's submission that the matter requires adjudication by a competent Civil Court, not criminal prosecution, and found no inaction or negligence by officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case