ARDHALA NAGA MALLESWARI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/12078/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010203032026

Filing Number

WP/16330/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/12078/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Balaji Medamalli

Coram

Balaji Medamalli

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARDHALA NAGA MALLESWARI

    Adv. KUNUKU RAJA SEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Station House Officer,

  3. 3.Maddisani Brahmmaiah,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Balaji MedamalliView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/12078/2026 Court Decision: The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition seeking protection from repeated unlawful police summons, but directed police to strictly follow due process when securing her presence, while requiring her cooperation with the ongoing investigation. Key Facts: The petitioner challenged repeated phone calls from police (allegedly to coerce withdrawal of a domestic violence case) without proper procedure. The state government submitted that a separate crime case was registered and the petitioner was contacted only to secure her appearance as an accused, which she avoided. Ruling: The court balanced both interests—allowing investigation to proceed while imposing safeguards requiring police to obtain proper authorization before summoning the petitioner, rejecting claims of wholesale harassment while maintaining investigative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Balaji Medamalli

  4. 14-May-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  5. 04-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12078/2026

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    D RameshView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/12078/2026 Court Decision: The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition seeking protection from repeated unlawful police summons, but directed police to strictly follow due process when securing her presence, while requiring her cooperation with the ongoing investigation. Key Facts: The petitioner challenged repeated phone calls from police (allegedly to coerce withdrawal of a domestic violence case) without proper procedure. The state government submitted that a separate crime case was registered and the petitioner was contacted only to secure her appearance as an accused, which she avoided. Ruling: The court balanced both interests—allowing investigation to proceed while imposing safeguards requiring police to obtain proper authorization before summoning the petitioner, rejecting claims of wholesale harassment while maintaining investigative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case