Shriram General Insurance Company Limited vs Kondapalli Siva Nageswara Rao Advocate - BADDI MANIKANTA N S V AVINASH — MACMA/348/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010197902026

Filing Number

MACMA/15924/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

MACMA/348/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

V.sujatha

Coram

V.sujatha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MACMA ( 18 )

Sub-Category

MACMA(DEATH) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram General Insurance Company Limited

    Adv. KORAGANTI SREENIVASARAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kondapalli Siva Nageswara Rao Advocate - BADDI MANIKANTA N S V AVINASH

  2. 2.Kondapalli Paramesh

    Adv. BADDI MANIKANTA N S V AVINASH

  3. 3.Kondapalli Sankar

    Adv. BADDI MANIKANTA N S V AVINASH

  4. 4.Chenna Triveni

    Adv. BADDI MANIKANTA N S V AVINASH

  5. 5.Pati Vara Prasad

  6. 6.Ch. Anjaneya Babu

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    V.sujatha

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    V.sujathaView PDF

    Case Summary: MACMA/348/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued notice to the respondents in Shriram General Insurance Company Limited's petition. The court permitted the petitioner's counsel to serve personal notice via RPAD (Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due) returnable within three weeks, with proof of service to be filed. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 07.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MACMA/348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACMA/348/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued notice to the respondents in Shriram General Insurance Company Limited's petition. The court permitted the petitioner's counsel to serve personal notice via RPAD (Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due) returnable within three weeks, with proof of service to be filed. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 07.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case