SMT SANAPALA PARVATHI vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/14476/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010197292026

Filing Number

WP/15878/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/14476/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT SANAPALA PARVATHI

    Adv. M. SAPTHAGIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Tahsildar,

  4. 4.The Station House Officer

    Adv. GP FOR HOME

  5. 5.Bammidi Narayana Rao,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/14476/2026 SMT SANAPALA PARVATHI v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's writ petition, directing the Tahsildar and District Collector not to interfere with her peaceful possession of 2.83 acres of agricultural land in Srikakulam District without following due process of law. The court held that although the respondents questioned the genuineness of the petitioner's Pattadar Pass Book and Possession Certificate, they cannot dispossess her based merely on claims that documents are forged without first conducting a proper enquiry. Since the petitioner had been in continuous possession since 2006, any action affecting her possession must follow statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  4. 14-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  5. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14476/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/14476/2026 SMT SANAPALA PARVATHI v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's writ petition, directing the Tahsildar and District Collector not to interfere with her peaceful possession of 2.83 acres of agricultural land in Srikakulam District without following due process of law. The court held that although the respondents questioned the genuineness of the petitioner's Pattadar Pass Book and Possession Certificate, they cannot dispossess her based merely on claims that documents are forged without first conducting a proper enquiry. Since the petitioner had been in continuous possession since 2006, any action affecting her possession must follow statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case