Sree Gowthami Rice Industries, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — WP/10055/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010196502026

Filing Number

WP/15806/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/10055/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Coram

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

APSEB (MISC.MATTERS) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sree Gowthami Rice Industries,

    Adv. P NARASIMHA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh

  2. 2.The Secretary,

  3. 3.The Chairman and Managing Director,

    Adv. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

  4. 4.The Superintending Engineer,

    Adv. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

  5. 5.The Divisional Engineer,

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    Admission (A P S E B)

    Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Venkateswarlu NimmagaddaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/10055/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati adjourned the petition filed by Sree Gowthami Rice Industries against The State of Andhra Pradesh and others. The court directed the respondents to file a counter-affidavit and listed the matter for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Admission (A P S E B)

    Harinath.n

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10055/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/10055/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati adjourned the petition filed by Sree Gowthami Rice Industries against The State of Andhra Pradesh and others. The court directed the respondents to file a counter-affidavit and listed the matter for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case