C JASWANTH NAGA SREEDHAR REDDY vs A VIJAYA KUMARI — CRP/1067/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010190332026

Filing Number

CRP/15316/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRP/1067/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Ninala Jayasurya

Coram

Ninala Jayasurya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE 227 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C JASWANTH NAGA SREEDHAR REDDY

    Adv. JITENDRA KANYALUR

  2. 2.Smt. M.Saraswathi,

  3. 3.M.Ramamurthy,

  4. 4.M.Venkatramana,

  5. 5.. Smt. C.G.Prathiba

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A VIJAYA KUMARI

  2. 2.A.Chengalrayappa

  3. 3.E.Sreenivasulu,

  4. 4.B.Jayappa,

  5. 5.T.Siva Kumar

  6. 6.Madiraju Ramakrishnama Raju,

    Adv. M SIVA KUMAR

  7. 7.Madiraju Pradeep Raju,

    Adv. M SIVA KUMAR

  8. 8.Madiraju Sudeep Raju,

    Adv. M SIVA KUMAR

  9. 9.Smt. U.Swarupa,

  10. 10.G.Brahmaiah,

  11. 11.V.Krishnappa,

  12. 12.M.Viswanadha Reddy,

  13. 13.Smt. G.Thulasi Rani,

  14. 14.Smt. S.Najma,

  15. 15.M.Venkata Narayana Reddy,

  16. 16.P.Murali Mohan,

  17. 17.M.Ramesh Babu,

  18. 18.P.Bhaskar Reddy,

  19. 19.Smt. A.Indira,

  20. 20.U.Venugopal

  21. 21.U.Dwarakapathi,

  22. 22.M.Jaffar Basha,

  23. 23.P.Jareena,

  24. 24.D.Siril,

  25. 25.D.Francis

  26. 26.D.George,

  27. 27.S.M.Nazeer,

  28. 28.O.Bhagyamma,

  29. 29.S.R.Khadar Sharif,

  30. 30.M.L.Suresh Babu,

  31. 31.M.Reddeppa

  32. 32.G.Sankar Reddy

  33. 33.L.Narayana,

  34. 34.G.Subhash Reddy,

  35. 35.T.Mohammad Iliyas

  36. 36.H.N.Nagarjuna Reddy

  37. 37.H.N.Prakash Ramchandra

  38. 38.S.Alim,

  39. 39.K.Narayana

  40. 40.V.Rajasekhar

  41. 41.V.Nagaraja

  42. 42.P.Venkatramana,

  43. 43.V.Govindappa,

  44. 44.S.Khadar Basha,

  45. 45.G.Sankar Reddy,

  46. 46.S.Krishnamurthy,

  47. 47.S.Damodaram,

  48. 48.G.Chenga Reddy,

  49. 49.G.Sriramulu Reddy,

  50. 50.M.Nandeeswara,

  51. 51.M.Rajanna,

  52. 52.Smt. M.Nageshwari,

  53. 53.M.Sai Kiran,

  54. 54.B.Ramana,

  55. 55.K.Chandramohan,

  56. 56.V.Venkataramana,

  57. 57.K.Chandrasekhar Reddy,

  58. 58.P.Ganesh Reddy,

  59. 59.M.Ahmad,

  60. 60.Jahid Shaik,

  61. 61.Smt. I.Fatima,

  62. 62.Smt. S.Haseena,

  63. 63.Smt. S.Gajalajabeen,

  64. 64.S.Sardar,

  65. 65.S.Saddam,

  66. 66.S.Aleem

  67. 67.S.Sayed Ali,

  68. 68.Smt. V.Indiramma

  69. 69.K.Brahmahachari,

  70. 70.A.Raghunadha Reddy,

  71. 71.Smt. S.Noor Tej,

  72. 72.G.Venkata Ramanappa,

  73. 73.A.Srinivasula Reddy,

  74. 74.P.Ayub Basha,

  75. 75.S.V.Bhanuprasad,

  76. 76.T.Guruprasad Setty,

  77. 77.P.Nagabushan Reddy,

  78. 78.B.Asraf Ali,

  79. 79.G.Raghu

  80. 80.P.Venkatramana,

  81. 81.S.Shakul Ahmed,

  82. 82.S.Reddeppa Reddy,

  83. 83.Smt. B.Manjula

  84. 84.Smt. S.Amreen,

  85. 85.D.Rajendra Prasad,

  86. 86.Arikela Venugopal Raju,

  87. 87.R.Ramanjula,

  88. 88.P.Ramana,

  89. 89.V.Sreedhar Reddy,

  90. 90.B.Surendra Raju,

  91. 91.Smt. S.Gowramma,

  92. 92.Smt. N.Gnanamba @ Gnanavathamma,

  93. 93.Smt. K.Bharathi,

  94. 94.Smt. K.Sakunthala,

  95. 95.K.Loka Raju,

  96. 96.The Tahsildar,

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Ninala Jayasurya

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Ninala JayasuryaView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Revision Petition No. 1067 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted an interim stay of all further proceedings in the underlying case, finding that the invocation of Rule 60 of Civil Rules of Practice was not sustainable and required examination. Notice was issued to respondents 1-8, and the matter was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Ninala Jayasurya

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Ninala Jayasurya

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1067/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Revision Petition No. 1067 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted an interim stay of all further proceedings in the underlying case, finding that the invocation of Rule 60 of Civil Rules of Practice was not sustainable and required examination. Notice was issued to respondents 1-8, and the matter was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case