N NAVIKA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — WP/9600/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: APHC010175822026
Filing Number
WP/14167/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/9600/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Subba Reddy Satti
Coram
Subba Reddy Satti
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N NAVIKA
Adv. D DORABABU
-
2.R. Padmanabham,
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
-
2.The District Collector,
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
3.The District Panchayath Officer,
-
4.The Tahsildar,
-
5.The MPDO
-
6.The Village Revenue Officer
-
7.The V. Kota Gram Panchayat,
-
8.M.V. Mahesh Babu Reddy
Adv. S PARINEETA
-
9.T.V. Radha Krishna,
Adv. S PARINEETA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
Subba Reddy Satti
-
21-Apr-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the writ petition filed by N Navika and Others against the State of Andhra Pradesh to 22.04.2026 at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely posted for further hearing in the same list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
Subba Reddy Satti
-
10-Apr-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/9600/2026
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the writ petition filed by N Navika and Others against the State of Andhra Pradesh to 22.04.2026 at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely posted for further hearing in the same list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts