ARAJALLA HARI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2556/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010175512026
Filing Number
CRLP/3397/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2556/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Coram
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARAJALLA HARI
Adv. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Victim women
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the bail petition of Arajalla Hari, accused of rape under Section 69 BNS, finding prima facie material against him based on the complainant's allegations that he sexually exploited her through false promises of marriage, resulting in her pregnancy. The court denied bail citing the seriousness of allegations, ongoing investigation, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
10-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
09-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2556/2026
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the bail petition of Arajalla Hari, accused of rape under Section 69 BNS, finding prima facie material against him based on the complainant's allegations that he sexually exploited her through false promises of marriage, resulting in her pregnancy. The court denied bail citing the seriousness of allegations, ongoing investigation, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts