Biraj Kumar Behara vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2544/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 15th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010174682026
e-Filing Number
01-04-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/3384/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2544/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Coram
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Biraj Kumar Behara
Adv. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to Biraj Kumar Behara, accused in a narcotic drugs case (Crime No. 40/2025 under NDPS Act), since the statutory investigation period expired without any charge sheet being filed. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties, weekly reporting to police, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition on tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
10-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
09-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2544/2026
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to Biraj Kumar Behara, accused in a narcotic drugs case (Crime No. 40/2025 under NDPS Act), since the statutory investigation period expired without any charge sheet being filed. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties, weekly reporting to police, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition on tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts