K C P SUGAR AND INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD vs KOKKILAGADDA PRASAD — WP/9593/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010169522026
Filing Number
WP/13635/2026
Filing Date
31-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/9593/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
D Ramesh
Coram
D Ramesh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
LABOUR MATTERS (MISC.MATTERS) ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K C P SUGAR AND INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD
Adv. DARSI BALA RAJU
-
2.The Chief Operating Officer
Respondent(s)
-
1.KOKKILAGADDA PRASAD
-
2.The Chief Operating Officer
-
3.The Presiding Officer,
Adv. GP FOR SERVICES II
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
D RameshView PDF
Summary of WP/9593/2026 KCP Sugar and Industries Corporation Ltd sought a Writ of Certiorari to quash a Labour Court Award dated 03-09-2025 (ID 30/2020), challenging it as arbitrary and violative of constitutional Articles 14, 16, and 21 and the Industrial Disputes Act. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice to respondents Kokkilagadda Prasad, the company's Chief Operating Officer, and the Labour Court Presiding Officer, directing them to appear within four weeks and explain why the petition should not be admitted. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
D RameshView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission
D Ramesh
-
31-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/9593/2026
Summary of WP/9593/2026 KCP Sugar and Industries Corporation Ltd sought a Writ of Certiorari to quash a Labour Court Award dated 03-09-2025 (ID 30/2020), challenging it as arbitrary and violative of constitutional Articles 14, 16, and 21 and the Industrial Disputes Act. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a show cause notice to respondents Kokkilagadda Prasad, the company's Chief Operating Officer, and the Labour Court Presiding Officer, directing them to appear within four weeks and explain why the petition should not be admitted. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts