Boddu Prem Kumar, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, — WP/8430/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010165422026
Filing Number
WP/13297/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8430/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
Coram
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MINES, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 32 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Boddu Prem Kumar,
Adv. CHETAN PONNURU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh,
-
2.The Tahsildar,
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
3.The Station House Officer,
Adv. GP FOR HOME
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court allowed the writ petition and held that authorities cannot seize a vehicle for transporting sand without valid documents; instead, they must levy penalties as per Rule 9-B(19) of G.O.Ms.No.100. The court directed that after the petitioner pays the penalty and produces payment receipt and ownership documents, the police must release the seized lorry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission (Mines And Industries)
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8430/2026
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court allowed the writ petition and held that authorities cannot seize a vehicle for transporting sand without valid documents; instead, they must levy penalties as per Rule 9-B(19) of G.O.Ms.No.100. The court directed that after the petitioner pays the penalty and produces payment receipt and ownership documents, the police must release the seized lorry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts