Venny Infra Works, vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — WP /8461/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

CNR: APHC010164712026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP /13238/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP /8461/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

Coram

MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MINES, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 32 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

Venny Infra Works,

Adv. CHETAN PONNURU

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

The Tahsildar,

Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

The Station House Officer,

Adv. GP FOR HOME

Hearing History

Judge: MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

31-03-2026

ADMISSION (MINES AND INDUSTRIES)

Orders

31-03-2026
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the writ petition filed by Venny Infra Works against the seizure of its lorry (AP 39 TV 6143) for allegedly transporting sand without valid documents. The court held that authorities cannot seize vehicles for mineral transportation violations; instead, they must levy penalties under G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 26.06.2025. The court directed the authorities to impose appropriate penalties, and upon the petitioner's payment and submission of ownership documents, the police must release the seized vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the writ petition filed by Venny Infra Works against the seizure of its lorry (AP 39 TV 6143) for allegedly transporting sand without valid documents. The court held that authorities cannot seize vehicles for mineral transportation violations; instead, they must levy penalties under G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 26.06.2025. The court directed the authorities to impose appropriate penalties, and upon the petitioner's payment and submission of ownership documents, the police must release the seized vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case