Guda Venkata Konda Reddy vs Gandham Yesurathnam Advocate - MADALA SAI TEJA — CRLRC/343/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010164282026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLRC/3220/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLRC/343/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLRC ( 42 )

Sub-Category

U/s.138 and 142 N.I.Act-Conviction ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Guda Venkata Konda Reddy

    Adv. YADAVALLI RAMESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gandham Yesurathnam Advocate - MADALA SAI TEJA

  2. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed a criminal revision case where the petitioner (accused) and respondent (complainant) reached a compromise. The court permitted the compromise under Section 320(6) of the Criminal Procedure Code read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitted the petitioner, and set aside the lower court's conviction judgment, subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 10,000 as costs to the District Legal Services Authority for children's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    For Appearance

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLRC/343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed a criminal revision case where the petitioner (accused) and respondent (complainant) reached a compromise. The court permitted the compromise under Section 320(6) of the Criminal Procedure Code read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitted the petitioner, and set aside the lower court's conviction judgment, subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 10,000 as costs to the District Legal Services Authority for children's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case