Sri Mittapalli Chandramohan vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2463/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010163542026
Filing Number
CRLP/3200/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2463/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Coram
Y. Lakshmana Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s. 528 BNSS Quash the FIR(CRL.5A-N) ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri Mittapalli Chandramohan
Adv. SINGURU SAI KRISHNA
-
2.Smt Tulasi Tanuja
-
3.Mittapalli Shivani @ Shivani
-
4.Nagasarapu Babu alias Anjaneyulu
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Mittapalli Rajendra Babu
Adv. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
For Admission
Y. Lakshmana Rao
-
31-Mar-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF
Summary: Criminal Petition No. 2463 of 2026 was heard by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati on March 31, 2026. The court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, since all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. The matter was posted for hearing of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on April 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2463/2026
Summary: Criminal Petition No. 2463 of 2026 was heard by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati on March 31, 2026. The court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, since all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. The matter was posted for hearing of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on April 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts