THRIPURANTHAKAM PRATHYUSHA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — WP /8410/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: APHC010163472026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WP /13141/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP /8410/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

D RAMESH

Coram

D RAMESH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

THRIPURANTHAKAM PRATHYUSHA

Adv. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI

Thripuranthakam Ruthvick,

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

The Director General of Police,

Adv. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Superintendent of Police,

The Accountant General,

The District Treasury Officer,

Kandukuru Padmavathamma,

Hearing History

Judge: D RAMESH

31-03-2026

ADMISSION

Orders

31-03-2026
D RAMESH
31-03-2026
D RAMESH

SUMMARY: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a direction in Writ Petition No. 8410 of 2026 restraining respondents, particularly the Superintendent of Police, Accountant General, and District Treasury Officer, from releasing pension and retirement benefits of a deceased employee to respondent No. 6 (Kandukuru Padmavathamma) until further orders. The Court found that the petitioners (the deceased employee's children) are disputing the claim, having already filed a separate civil suit (S.O.P. No. 16/2024) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Nellore alleging fabricated documents. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for filing counter-affidavits, with directions to keep any released amounts in a separate deposit or suspense account pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued a direction in Writ Petition No. 8410 of 2026 restraining respondents, particularly the Superintendent of Police, Accountant General, and District Treasury Officer, from releasing pension and retirement benefits of a deceased employee to respondent No. 6 (Kandukuru Padmavathamma) until further orders. The Court found that the petitioners (the deceased employee's children) are disputing the claim, having already filed a separate civil suit (S.O.P. No. 16/2024) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Nellore alleging fabricated documents. The matter was adjourned for four weeks for filing counter-affidavits, with directions to keep any released amounts in a separate deposit or suspense account pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case