G SUDHA RANI vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II — WP/8357/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010163092026

Filing Number

WP/13107/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/8357/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

D Ramesh

Coram

D Ramesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

WOMEN DEVE.& CHILD WELFARE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G SUDHA RANI

    Adv. YASWANTH GADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES II

  2. 2.The Director

    Adv. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

  3. 3.The District Women and Child Welfare and Empowerment Officer

  4. 4.The Project Director

  5. 5.The Rashtriya Seva Samithi(RASS),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    D RameshView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a writ petition filed by G. Sudha Rani, a Child Development Project Officer, who challenged her illegal termination by the Rashtriya Seva Samithi without any enquiry or personal hearing. The court found the petition disposed of because the respondent authorities reconsidered her case after the petition was filed and reinstated her into service. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Admission (Women & Child Welfare)

    Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkateswarlu NimmagaddaView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8357/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a writ petition filed by G. Sudha Rani, a Child Development Project Officer, who challenged her illegal termination by the Rashtriya Seva Samithi without any enquiry or personal hearing. The court found the petition disposed of because the respondent authorities reconsidered her case after the petition was filed and reinstated her into service. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case