Killi Dali Naidu vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2460/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010162982026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/3193/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2460/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Coram
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Killi Dali Naidu
Adv. G..SRINIVASU
-
2.Killi Chindramma
Adv. G SRINIVASU
-
3.Killi Chindramma,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused (Killi Dali Naidu and Killi Chindramma) in a case involving alleged violent assault with weapons on 16.12.2024. The court held that since previous similar bail petitions had already been dismissed by a coordinate bench without any material change in circumstances, successive bail applications cannot be entertained under established legal principles. The serious nature of the allegations—including attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt—also weighed against granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2460/2026
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused (Killi Dali Naidu and Killi Chindramma) in a case involving alleged violent assault with weapons on 16.12.2024. The court held that since previous similar bail petitions had already been dismissed by a coordinate bench without any material change in circumstances, successive bail applications cannot be entertained under established legal principles. The serious nature of the allegations—including attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt—also weighed against granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts