NAISA VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY vs THE STATE OF AP — WP/8393/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 07th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010162252026
Filing Number
WP/13038/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8393/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Coram
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAISA VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY
Adv. RAVULA NAGARJUNA
-
2.Paleti Venkata Ramana,
-
3.Nasia Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy,
-
4.Giddaluru Raviteja,
-
5.Veesam Eswarareddy,
-
6.Abburi Rajaiah Naidu,
-
7.Naisa Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy,
-
8.Banagani Subramanayam,
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF AP
-
2.The Director/Commissioner,
-
3.The Deputy Commissioner,
-
4.The District Prohibition and Excise Officer,b
-
5.The Tahsildar,
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Venkateswarlu NimmagaddaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 7 April 2026. Eight wine shop licensees challenged the state's Retail Excise Tax (RET) assessment of ₹65,00,000 per annum, arguing the tax was wrongly calculated based on an inflated population figure for Railway Koduru. The court granted the petitioners' request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after obtaining necessary information, without prejudice to their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Admission (Excise)
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
31-Mar-2026
Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8393/2026
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 7 April 2026. Eight wine shop licensees challenged the state's Retail Excise Tax (RET) assessment of ₹65,00,000 per annum, arguing the tax was wrongly calculated based on an inflated population figure for Railway Koduru. The court granted the petitioners' request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after obtaining necessary information, without prejudice to their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts