Ghattamaneni Purushothem Chowdarry vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2453/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010161962026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
CRLP/3173/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2453/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Coram
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ghattamaneni Purushothem Chowdarry
Adv. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to Ghattamaneni Purushothem Chowdarry (Accused No.2) in a narcotics case under Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. The court found that despite his custody since January 23, 2026, there was insufficient material evidence linking him to the offense beyond the confessional statement of co-accused No.1, the contraband quantity was non-commercial, and his co-accused had already been released on bail, warranting parity. He was released on a Rs. 20,000 personal bond with conditions including bi-monthly police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2453/2026
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to Ghattamaneni Purushothem Chowdarry (Accused No.2) in a narcotics case under Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. The court found that despite his custody since January 23, 2026, there was insufficient material evidence linking him to the offense beyond the confessional statement of co-accused No.1, the contraband quantity was non-commercial, and his co-accused had already been released on bail, warranting parity. He was released on a Rs. 20,000 personal bond with conditions including bi-monthly police reporting and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts