TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs BARATAM TUSHAR Advocate - KOMMAREDDY DIVAKARA REDDY — MACMA/242/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Status: Admission. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010160782026
Filing Number
MACMA/12932/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
MACMA/242/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy , Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Coram
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy , Tuhin Kumar Gedela
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MACMA ( 18 )
Sub-Category
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISC. APPEALS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL Section
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. KESAVI KUMARI NEMALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BARATAM TUSHAR Advocate - KOMMAREDDY DIVAKARA REDDY
-
2.Baratam Sangeetha,
Adv. KOMMAREDDY DIVAKARA REDDY
-
3.Mr. Arun Mirbar,
-
4.Hari Bandhu Khara,
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Admission
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy , Tuhin Kumar Gedela
-
08-May-2026
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy,tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF
Case Status Summary: In M.A.C.M.A. No. 242 of 2026 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Amaravati), the case was adjourned to 16.06.2026. Notice was served on respondent No.4, but no appearance was made on his behalf. The matter was listed for filing of counter by respondents Nos.1 and 2 at their counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Admission
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy , Tuhin Kumar Gedela
-
01-May-2026
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy,tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF
-
01-May-2026
For Admission
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy , Tuhin Kumar Gedela
-
10-Apr-2026
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy,tuhin Kumar GedelaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MACMA/242/2026
Case Status Summary: In M.A.C.M.A. No. 242 of 2026 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Amaravati), the case was adjourned to 16.06.2026. Notice was served on respondent No.4, but no appearance was made on his behalf. The matter was listed for filing of counter by respondents Nos.1 and 2 at their counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts