Vudumudi Jaya Prasad, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — WP/8140/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010158932026
Filing Number
WP/12768/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/8140/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Subba Reddy Satti
Coram
Subba Reddy Satti
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vudumudi Jaya Prasad,
Adv. KARRE SATYANANDAM
-
2.Poripireddy Hymavathi,
-
3.Gudavalasa Srinivasa Rao
-
4.Tatipaka Mani,
-
5.Bale Shyamala,
-
6.Boddu Pandu Ranga Rao,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh
-
2.The District Collector,
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
3.The Tahsildar,
-
4.The Badampudi Gram Panchayat
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
31-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
Case Summary WP No. 8140 of 2026 | High Court of Andhra Pradesh The High Court issued a Rule Nisi (notice to respondents to show cause) on a petition by six businesspersons challenging an order by Badampudi Gram Panchayat dated 06-03-2026 that allegedly violated natural justice principles. The court extended the earlier interim order protecting the petitioners' possession of their shops/houses and adjourned the matter to 28.04.2026 for the respondents to file a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
Subba Reddy Satti
-
24-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Subba Reddy SattiView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8140/2026
Case Summary WP No. 8140 of 2026 | High Court of Andhra Pradesh The High Court issued a Rule Nisi (notice to respondents to show cause) on a petition by six businesspersons challenging an order by Badampudi Gram Panchayat dated 06-03-2026 that allegedly violated natural justice principles. The court extended the earlier interim order protecting the petitioners' possession of their shops/houses and adjourned the matter to 28.04.2026 for the respondents to file a counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts